Changes to Healthcare Policy
Individual, Person-Centered Care to No Longer Matter, Because "Carbon"
I just saw a video advertised to me on youtube, from this:
“Lancet 200
Since 1993, The Lancet has worked to reveal climate change to be the biggest global health threat of the 21st century, and also a tremendous opportunity to tackle the social and environmental determinants of health…
I didn’t get far before this already set alarm bells off for me. “Worked to reveal…” - and not “to determine if there is a link” or “to test the hypothesis that” - is about as anti-science a statement as it gets. They are explicit that they are working to prove themselves right, whereas in science we test to destruction our own pet theories, and do everything we can to prove ourselves wrong.
The very next sentence was also a red flag for me, as they also seem to be readily admitting that they are making a drama out of their own hypothetical crises, with the almost gleeful ends-justifying-the-means phrase “tremendous opportunity…”
To my mind, such people will be willing to distort the truth and exaggerate the data in any way they can, in order to make it conform to their own stated true ends.
Since 2016, an international, multidisciplinary collaboration, has monitored the evolving health profile of climate change, and provided an independent assessment of the delivery of commitments made by governments worldwide under the Paris Agreement. To drive further progress, we call on...
Governments to rapidly phase out the exploration, extraction, production, and use of fossil fuels in a fair and equitable manner—and end the expansion of fossil fuel supplies
Health organisations and facilities to invest in decarbonisation and to adapt to accommodate current and future impacts of climate on health and society”.
This immediately tells me that this is not about health and wellness at all, and quite the opposite. As many others have pointed out, rapidly moving to a low energy society will kill millions, and cause immense global suffering, due to the inevitable food shortages and lack of heating. For example, the cold kills ten time more people than the heat.
Here is my synopsis of the video:
It is based on extreme fearmongering, and on very extreme climate and especially weather alarmism, using very extreme language, and tone of voice. This immediately flags up to me that this can have nothing to do with health, not of individuals, the public, nor global society. Chronic fear and institutional level fear mongering is known to a be absolutely massive negative impactor on health, immune function (inability to resist infections), and life span. Indeed, my whole thing is that chronic stress is the root cause of most of chronic disease, illnesses, and suffering in the modern world (which is why I felt so strongly it is my duty to speak out against this video and the revealed plans of our low-quality elites).
So I just cannot take seriously anyone who talks about health while using fear mongering to get compliance, because these are so very antithetical. I certainly can not forgive those who are deliberately causing such fear and anxiety in our young folks or children,
The video talks a lot about the greater good, collectivism over the individual, equity… basically it is full on Neo-Marxist language, and we all where know where that ends.
It proposes we move away from individual based person-centred care, i.e. from looking at a person’s symptoms and treating then, to looking at a more global picture (equity). Basically, as far as I can make out, individual people in the west are to be made to suffer, and to have treatments withheld, in the name of collective health of developing countries.
“Clinicians have a duty not just to the person in front of them, but to the carbon footprint of the treatments.”
The National Health Service won't purchase from companies who don't have their own Net Zero agenda. I think this results in the NHS only being able to procure from monopolies of big corporations how can get (buy) high ESG scores and carbon credits (greenwashing).
They are targeting getting rid of asthma inhalers as the propellants release tiny amounts of CO2. I wouldn’t be surprised if some of these have just gone out of patent, and Big Pharma have a new delivery system to push.
Targeting walking aids/Zimmer frames.
Targeting getting rid of anaesthetics.
Using sites and land owned by NHS to install large solar panel farms and heat pumps, presumably instead of building new hospitals or facilities (in the UK the lack of parking spaces for hospitals is already a joke, what remains are likely to be prime real state for solar panels).
Improving air quality as health emergency as an NHS agenda priority - they are calling for green cities (15 minute cities - you know, the ones where ambulances can’t get to people in an emergency).
To my mind, these overt plans of our low equality elites, very thinly disguised by climate alarmism (actually, it is worse - it is weather alarmism) is yet another reason why we need to build alternative systems to support health and wellbeing as soon as possible, which I am trying to contribute towards, and why we need to wean ourselves off our current “healthcare” system, before it is taken away from us forcibly.
“Clinicians have a duty not just to the person in front of them, but to the carbon footprint of the treatments.”
THEY must push forward with this. It is their only option, to double-down. It will only get more egregious and insane going forward.
More people wake up as they do. Yes, new systems of sanity will emerge alongside this insanity. Gonna be messy.
Thank you, Gary.
The past four years have been astounding how emotion has been used by propaganda while logic is censored. Industrial Medicine has become a joke.